![]() Most important, he shows you what doesn't work-and why-and how to cultivate skillfulness. He teaches dozens of techniques that make a big difference. tackling your writing projects more efficiently.quoting authority more effectively and.using transitions deftly to make your argument flow.cutting wordiness that wastes readers' time.framing issues that arrest the readers' attention.The seminar covers five essential skills for persuasive writing: Professor Garner gives you the keys to make the most of your writing aptitude-in letters, memos, briefs, and more. You'll also learn what doesn't work and why-know-how gathered through Professor Garner's unique experience in training lawyers at the country's top law firms, state and federal courts, government agencies, and Fortune 500 companies. ![]() You'll learn the keys to professional writing and acquire no-nonsense techniques to make your letters, memos, and briefs more powerful. More than 215,000 people-including lawyers, judges, law clerks, and paralegals-have benefited since the early 1990s. Garner: Advanced Legal Writing & EditingĪttend the most popular CLE seminar of all time. Live seminars this year with Professor Bryan A. You may be surprised to learn that you should strike more than stricken from your vocabulary. For a full listing with inflections, see Garner’s Modern American Usage 481–82 (3d ed. The English language has more than 200 such verbs, and they can be tricky. Do you know how to inflect these: bid drink sling slink stink? Irregular verbs are perennially troublesome to writers. Whatever you do, avoid the solecism strickened, which is a double error occasionally attested from the early 19th century on. Others will prefer to stick with struck-the more correct past participle. Given stricken‘s frequency of use in legal writing, some lawyers may conclude that they should continue to use the term. A Westlaw search in the “allcases” database shows that stricken from the record has predominated in the last ten years by a 7-to-1 ratio. )īut in legal writing, the nonstandard form stricken is common. (Of course, stricken is fine as an adjective. ![]() Today, struck predominates by a 12-to-1 ratio. A search using big data confirms that in books of all types published from 1700 to the present day, struck has always greatly outnumbered stricken. The alternative past participle, stricken, has long been considered nonstandard. Like plead, the verb strike causes lawyers and judges to hesitate in forming the past participle: has the judge struck something from the record or stricken it from the record?Įnglish-language authorities have long said that the verb strike should be inflected strike > struck > struck, hence today I strike, yesterday I struck, many times I have struck.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |